Why Teach Physics in High Schools?
(and what those say who are opposed to it)
The key reasons for the study of physics is that physics helps us to:
- control and exploit the forces of nature
(proves a sense of empowerment)
- satisfy human curiosity
- understand the body of knowledge we call science so that
we may choose between good and bad applications
- become aware of nature and its limitations
- avoid alienation from the technological world
- understand
our world because science is a prerequisite for a thorough understanding
- distinguish between fact and fiction
- lead healthier and safer lives
- promote a scientific attitude
- provide ourselves with a competent work force to maintain economic
growth
- build problem-solving skills
- understand the greatest of human accomplishment
- generate openness to new ideas
- provide the simplest of systems to study (in contrast with complex systems
encountered in biology and chemistry)
- provide content relevant to other fields of study
- understand the role that physics has had in shaping history
- with the development of a liberal
education
- provides a common basis for discussion and understandings
- understand our own limitations and capabilities
- maintain our stewardship of planet earth
- gain insight into how people have explained the
physical world
- become better consumers - we won't get
ripped off by outlandish claims
- see that nature is inherently comprehensible
- federal and state law call for higher accountability among students, and
part of the accountability framework is physics
- physics is a "central" subject, essential to the understanding of such
disciplines as biology and chemistry; check out "Physics First" websites to
see some of the argumentation in this area.
- physics heavily used in various military careers and these students won't
have an opportunity to take physics in the military
- physics heavily used in the professions and trades such as doctor, nurse,
aviator, plumber, and electrician
- physics promotes careers in physical science and engineering, without
which the US can not do
- physics central to understanding much of the technology we encounter on
a daily basis in our vocations
- physics provides intellectual challenges in the way that many other courses
of study do not
When attempting to justify physics in a high school curriculum, be certain
to focus on those things that make Physics unique. Many other disciplines can
make many of the same claims above.
Why NOT teach physics?
Here are some reasons (not all good) why a school administration might argue
against keeping a physics course during budget short falls, etc.:
- physics technology is expensive and costly to keep up to date
- not as many student take physics
- most universities don't require any physics
- not a high school graduation requirement per se
- very few physics questions on state exams
- much of what is taught in physics can be taught in other courses such as
math or chemistry
- keeping larger enrollment courses is more cost effective and benefits students
disproportionately
- concentrate our resources in courses that are less expensive to maintain
- students can take physics in college if the want and/or need it
- physics is too hard; it attracts those who least need to benefit from it
- math prerequisite not met by many students
- few students go on to careers in physics
- physics tends to separate the gifted from those less advantaged and this
is contrary to inclusion principles
- dropping physics will affect the least number of students
- information in other courses has broad applicability too; what's so special
about physics
- historic chemists and biologist are better role models than physicists
who are a bunch of dead, white, European males
- most high school students don't have the mental maturity for the abstract
reasoning required by physics
- physics places stress on the math department to provide courses that fewer
students take
- physics has a bad reputation as being "hard" and students' grades suffer
as a result
- physics is at the end of a lock-step sequence, so it's easy to cut; not
so with chemistry and biology which are in an earlier part of the sequence
- Latin was once said to improve critical thinking of students; it is now gone from the school curriculum due to the falsity of the claim
- we don't have highly qualified physics teachers
- why is your attendance so low?
Extra Items:
The Intuitor web page http://www.intuitor.com/ has
some interesting statements about the benefits of studying physics.
The American Institute of Physics' "Physics First" webpage http://www.aip.org/isns/reports/2002/034.html also
has excellent information about why to study physics.
AAPT Statement of Physics
First. American Association of Physics Teachers
(13 April 2003)
(Last updated 1/28/2009)