|
Good (3 points) |
Fair (2 points) |
Poor/Unacceptable (1-0 pt.) |
Score |
Preparation |
Everything in working
order, in place or readily accessible; evidence of rehearsal;
high quality drawing / handout if any. |
Things don't work well
or flow smoothly; one or two things out of place or missing;
only fair quality drawing / handout. |
Things are not in working
order; demonstration fails; no evidence of rehearsal or adequate
preparation; low quality drawing / handout |
|
Knowledge |
Demonstrates clear understanding
of principle or concept involved; accurately relates concept
to demonstration. |
Exhibits somewhat limited
understanding or principle demonstrated; minor inaccuracies in
relating demonstration. |
Lacks an understanding
of the principle or concept demonstrated; inaccurately relates
demonstration of principle or concept. |
|
Visibility |
Suitably large equipment,
background taken into consideration; color added to liquids;
adequate illumination; elevation to appropriate level; does not
hide display with body. |
Demonstration marginally
adequate as far as visibility is concerned; those in front can
see reasonably well, those in back have a hard time seeing. |
Demonstration hard to
see for any number of reasons; no evidence of concern by presenter
for visibility consideration. |
|
Simplicity |
Avoids unnecessary complexity
(e.g., adjustments) and common place materials if possible. |
Somewhat complex; the
demonstration is not overly helpful making point or introducing
concept. |
Students "can't
see the forest for the trees"; too complicated; concepts
too difficult or not appropriate. |
|
Suitability |
Demonstration employed
is probably the best for demonstrating concept. |
Demonstration adequate,
but a better choice might have been made. |
Poor connection between
demonstration and concept or principle. |
|
Safety |
Safety goggles and/or
protective screen used if appropriate; keeps students back; keeps
first aid and other emergency equipment on hand; takes full advantage
of facilities (vent, mirror, etc.). |
Is somewhat negligent
with regard to safety concern for self and/or others; some degree
of concern for safety expressed by students. |
Shows positive disregard
for student or own safety; fails to pass the test of foreseeablity;
shows negligence; threatens own student safety. (If any harm
occurs, requires score of 0.) |
|
Performance |
Employs mystery and
showmanship; uses precise in technique; demonstrates understanding
of scientific aspects of demonstration. |
Lack-luster presentation;
nothing fancy, but adequate. |
Poor delivery style;
poor technique. |
|
Pedagogy |
Maximizes educational
benefit of demonstration; gears demonstration toward students'
abilities and interests; interacts with students. |
Fails to gain maximum
educational benefit from demonstration by fully engaging students;
limited interaction with students. |
Demonstration appears
to have little or no educational value; bores students; students
not intellectually engaged; essentially lectures. |
|
Assessment |
Assesses student under-standing
by constant, thought-provoking questioning. |
Does incomplete job
of assessing student under-standing, or assesses only at end
of demonstration. |
Makes no attempt to
assess student understanding. |
|
Students |
Uses appropriate student
assistance as appropriate. |
Ineffectively employs
student assistance. |
Does not employ student
help even if necessary. |
|
Documentation |
Provides to each student
on time a high quality printed statement containing demonstration
name, equipment needed, principle demonstrated, basic procedures,
and basic drawing or image. |
Prepares but does not
provide to each student on time a high quality printed statement
containing demonstration name, equipment needed, principle demonstrated,
basic procedures, and basic drawing or image. |
Prepares poor quality
and/or incomplete printed statement and may or may not provide
copies to all students in a timely fashion. |
|
Copyright 2000 Illinois State University
Physics Teacher Education Program |
TOTAL POINTS: |
|