PHY 312 -- Teaching Physics from the Historical
Perspective
Illinois State University Physics Department
Physics Teacher Education Program
Carl J. Wenning, Program Coordinator
Course Objectives Assessed: (5a) The student will describe and explain the historical
development of a model (e.g., solar system, atom, heat, light,
gravitation, etc.) that shows the tentative nature of science
and the evolution of scientific thought in a social context,
explain how empirical approaches were used to determine the relative
correctness of those models, and relate the role of applied science
and technology to advancing scientific frontiers. |
Each essay must satisfy the following specific criteria:
Excellent (4 pts) |
Good (3 points) |
Fair (2 points) |
Poor/Unaccept (1-0 pt) |
Score |
|
Format | Paper is typed double space, using a 12-point Times font or similar | Paper typed, but not double spaced; uses inappropriate font. | Paper handwritten, but quite legible. | Paper handwritten, but difficult to read. | |
Length | 3-4 pages in length exclusive of cover page and references. | 3-4 pages in length exclusive of cover page. | Entire paper 3-4 pages in length, including cover page and references. | Entire paper between 2-3 pages in length exclusive of cover page and references. | |
Grammar | Author makes consist use of appropriate grammar, punctuation, and spelling throughout essay. | Author has 2-5 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. | Author has 6-10 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. | Author has more than 10 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. | |
Presentation | Well organized and easy to read. | Fair organization, but doesn't "flow" as well as it should. | Can be followed only with some degree of difficulty. | Confusing presentation that can be followed only with great difficulty. | |
Reflection | Shows strong evidence of reasoned reflection; provides solid argument- ation for claims; work clearly that of the author. | Some evidence of reasoned reflection; some thoughts expressed those of another author. | Little evidence of reasoned reflection; clearly mimicking thoughts of other authors. | No evidence of reasoned reflection; statements made without supporting evidence; thought only of others. | |
Accuracy | No errors in historical or scientific fact; no flaws in logic. | Very few and only minor errors in historical or scientific fact, minor lapses in logic. | One major and only a few minor errors in historical or scientific fact; clear lapses of logic. | Several majors errors in historical or scientific fact; clear and repeated lapses of logic. | |
References | Contains not less than three references presented using APA or other standard format. | Contains not less than three references, but not presented using APA or other standard format. | Contains only two references, but presented using APA or other standard format. | Contains two or fewer references, but not presented using APA or other standard format. | |
Submission | Submitted on time during class indicated. | Submitted after class indicated, but not more than one class period late. | Turned in two class periods late. | Turned in three or more class periods late. | |
Completeness | Clearly addresses well all elements contained within the stated objective. | Addresses well most of the elements contained within the stated objective. | Addresses poorly any one of the elements contained within the stated objective. | Addresses poorly all of the elements contained within the stated objective; complete misses one or more objectives. | |
Copyright 2000 Illinois State University Physics Teacher Education Program |
TOTAL: |