Nature of Science Project
Rubric
WARNING: This in-course
summative assessment is related to the Admission to Student Teaching
institutional gateway for physics teacher education majors. In order to receive
the positive recommendation of the PTE coordinator required for Admission to
Student Teaching, all candidates must earn an overall average score of 2
(Acceptable) or above on of this performance task, in all three parts of the
essay writing process. In addition, no single dimension may be scored unacceptable.
Dimension |
Unacceptable (0) |
Inadequate (1 pt) |
Weak (1.5 pts) |
Acceptable (2 pt) |
Strong (2.5 pts) |
Score |
Title
& Abstract Page (addend) |
Title
only; no abstract provided or inappropriate. |
Abstract
rambling, imprecise and not comprehensive; on separate page with title. |
Abstract
rambling, imprecise or not comprehensive; on separate page with title. |
Abstract
concise, comprehensive, clearly communicates nature of essay's contents; on
separate page with title. |
N/A |
|
Organization (addend) |
Thesis
statement, introduction, body and close essentially indistinguishable; mostly
specific information with few generalities. |
Has
some of the essential components but is disorganized; no real movement from
generalities to specifics. |
Has
all the essential components, but is disorganized; moves generally from generalities
to the specifics. |
Thesis
statement, introduction, body, and close clearly discern-able; essay moves
regularly from generalities to specifics. |
N/A |
|
Writing Style
(addend) |
Too
familiar (e.g., repeated use of ³you²); rambling commentary; poorly
formulated paragraphs. |
Mixed
style; mostly too familiar; some-what professional, and/or poorly formulated
paragraphs. |
Mixed
style; mostly professional; somewhat too familiar; well formulated paragraphs. |
Mixed
style but can be fixed with a few minor revisions; well formulated paragraphs. |
Suitable
for journal publication with only insignificant modifications. |
|
Professionalism
(addend) |
Unprofessional;
no evidence of significant use of references; provides mostly general commentary
and personal opinions; strong evidence of ³surface learning² |
Less
profession-al; some material of substance, but lots of personal commentary;
could be enhanced considerably; shows more ³surface learning² than ³deep
learning² |
More
profession-al; material mostly of substance, but includes some opinions;
could be enhanced somewhat; shows more ³deep learning² than ³surface
learning² |
Profession;
clear evidence of use of several references; material of substantive value;
mostly research based; needs little improvement; evidence of ³deep learning² |
Very
profession; clear evidence of use of several references; material of
substantive value; research based; no needed improvement; strong evidence of
³deep learning² |
|
Accuracy (addend) |
Multiple
and gross errors in fact; grossly inaccurate conclusions. |
Multiple
minor errors in fact; poorly-drawn conclusions. |
Minor
errors in fact; reasonably well drawn conclusions. |
No
discernable errors in fact; well-grounded conclusions. |
N/A |
|
Citations
(addend) |
Cleary
uses othersı ideas without making in-line citations giving credit due. |
Often
uses otherıs ideas without making in-line citations. |
Once
or twice uses otherıs ideas without making in-line citations. |
Makes
appropriate use of in-line citations to credit due to others. |
N/A |
|
Completeness (addend) |
Addresses
full range of subject matter poorly. |
Addresses
full range of subject matter irregularly. |
Addresses
full range of subject matter adequately. |
Addresses
full range of subject matter very thoroughly. |
N/A |
|
Spelling,
Grammar, and Punctuation (addend) |
Poorly
written with numerous spelling, grammatical, and/or punctuation errors; a
number of major and minor grammatical errors; essentially unreadable. |
Tolerably
well written; a fair number of minor spelling, grammatical, and/or punctuation
errors; a few major error; confusing to reader; no evidence of revision &
proofing. |
Reasonably
well written; a few minor spelling, grammatical or punctuation errors; easy
and interesting reading; evidence of regular revision and proof reading. |
Well
written; no grammatical errors; insignificant number of punctuation errors;
no spelling errors; easy and interesting reading; clear evidence of regular
revision & proofing. |
Exceptionally
well written; no grammatical or punctuation errors; no spelling errors; easy
and interesting reading; clear evidence of regular revision & proofing. |
|
Dimension |
Unacceptable (0 ) |
Inadequate (1 pt) |
Weak (1.5 pts) |
Acceptable (2 pt) |
Strong (2.5 pts) |
|
||
Format
& Appearance (addend) |
Gross
violation of essay format guidelines dealing with font, font size, line
spacing, and border areas; poor print quality. |
Fails
to meet two or three guidelines of appropriate font, font size, line spacing,
and border areas; fair print quality. |
Fails
to meet one the guidelines for appropriate font, font size, line spacing, and
border areas; good print quality. |
Uses
appropriate font, font size, line spacing, and border areas; good layout;
good print quality. |
N/A |
|
||
References (addend) |
None
provided; essay clearly lacks evidence of appropriate review of resources. |
None
provided; essay shows some evidence of review of two or more resources. |
Two
or three provided but lacks critical sources; essay shows evidence of review
of several resources. |
Four
or more provided; essay shows evidence of review of several major critical resources. |
N/A |
|
||
|
Sum of Addends: |
30 |
||||||
Script
Length (assumes
correctly formatted minus title, abstract, references and lesson objectives;
submitted on time; post deadline no value; multiplier on sum of addends) |
Required
6-8 page paper: 1
complete pages (0.17X) 2
complete pages (0.33X) |
3
complete pages (0.50X) 4
complete pages (0.66X) |
5
compete pages (0.83X) 6
complete pages (1.00X) |
7
complete pages (1.05X) 8
complete pages (1.10X) |
|
|||
Required
4-6 page paper: 1
complete pages (0.25X) 2
complete pages (0.50X) |
3
complete pages (0.75X) 4
complete pages (1.0X) |
5
complete pages (1.05X) 6
complete pages (1.10X) |
|
|
||||
Integrity
(multiplier
on above) |
Essay
clearly plagiarized; no citation provided at all. (0X) |
Essentially
plagiarized; large amounts of direct quoting even though reference(s)
provided. (0.5X) |
Essay
not far from plagiarized; mere rearrangement of words; no evidence of own
creativity. (0.7X) |
Clearly
work of student; makes appropriate use of references and citations. (1X) |
N/A |
|
||
General Comments: |
Raw Score: |
30 |
||||||
Normalized Score: |
50 |
|||||||